<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PreZ who? &#187; sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prezwho.com/tag/sucks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prezwho.com</link>
	<description>Funny Videos We Have</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Wolfman Review</title>
		<link>http://prezwho.com/the-wolfman-review</link>
		<comments>http://prezwho.com/the-wolfman-review#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horrible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfman review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezwho.com/?p=2383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a movie that a buddy of mine and myself wanted to see ever since the first trailers appeared for Inglorious Basterds.  The Wolfman is a pretty simple and classic story that can easily be adapted into any period of modern film making really; this is no different. The problem with this movie was not the story, nor the story telling.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://prezwho.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Wolfman1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2388  aligncenter" title="Wolfman" src="http://prezwho.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Wolfman1-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Hello all,</p>
<p>Sorry I didn&#8217;t get this up sooner, been a little busy.</p>
<p>Here is a movie that a buddy of mine and myself wanted to see ever since  the first trailers appeared for <em>Inglorious Basterds</em>.  <em>The Wolfman</em> is a  pretty simple and classic story that can easily be adapted into any  period of modern film making really; this is no different. The problem  with this movie was not the  story, nor the story telling.</p>
<p><span id="more-2383"></span></p>
<p>Before giving you a blow by blow  commentary of why this movie fails, I&#8217;d first like to give credit where  credit is do, because not all aspects of this movie are bad.  First of  all, the entire cast, from Anthony Hopkins through Hugo Weavings were  all fantastic.  Weavings plays his part beautifully, as does  Hopkins and Del Toro&#8230; Just in general, everyone does a fabulous job.   In addition  to the acting, the Cinematography is also really neat and very well done  (except for the crappy CG animals.  There are only two, but damn are  they obviously CG).</p>
<p>Now, on to the fail: While acting may have  been spectacular, the direction was terrible.  It seemed as if Joe  Johnston was either over matched or just didn&#8217;t care.  For some reason,  he takes a really classical approach in the way he shoots the film (the  actual shots of the Werewolf were straight out of the original, and very  well done) and then goes Tarantino to the max and adds unnecessary and  unrealistic gore, gore that I&#8217;m sure Tarantino himself would not approve  of. Apparently, the film was not originally like this, and Johnston  brought in two guys to completely re-edit the film. If that&#8217;s true, that  explains a lot, as not only is this unnecessarily gruesome, but it also  transitions horribly.  in almost all but one transition scene, the  music doesn&#8217;t match the frame or the sequence, and they appear to come  out of no where.  In essence, the movie does not flow at all.</p>
<p>Johnston  also goes out of his way to put in &#8220;shutter&#8221; moments, or moments that  are startling.  The problem is that he never works up any tension, so  it&#8217;s just like &#8220;Oh, hi&#8230; yeah no, you got me there after the 20th  time&#8230; really.&#8221;</p>
<p>Did I mention the editing was horrible?</p>
<p>Anyway,  if you want to see this movie, regardless of what anyone says, at least  wait until you can redbox it, because it&#8217;s absolutely and pathetically  horrible; and I&#8217;m pretty upset that I spent 10.50.  I put it in the same  category as <em>Van Helsing</em>, it&#8217;s literally that bad.</p>
<p>So in  conclusion, <em>The Wolfman</em> get&#8217;s 1 Gun out of 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prezwho.com/the-wolfman-review/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->